Matching and price competition: would personalized prices help?
The author analyzes the generalized deferred- acceptance algorithm when preferences are known with an error. This algorithm incorporates personalized salaries and is considered as a replacement for the current algorithm for National Resident Matching Program. Maintaining Bulow and Levin's assumption on preferences [Am. Econ. Rev. 96(3) 652--668 (2006)], he shows that an error in preferences of a worker propagates through the algorithm, leading to a change in the salary of every more productive worker. Thus, relatively small individual errors accumulate towards the top and may lead to highly distorted salaries for top workers the same way as mild compression translates into highly compressed salaries on the top in the Bulow in the Levin study of the current National Resident Matching Program algorithm.
This page was built for publication: Matching and price competition: would personalized prices help?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2482676)