Quantifying incentive (in)compatibility: a case study from sports
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2672095
Recommendations
- Winning isn't everything: how sports competition rules can make you want to lose
- Can strategizing in round-robin subtournaments be avoided?
- How to design a multi-stage tournament when some results are carried over?
- On incentive compatible competitive selection protocols
- Incentives versus competitive balance
Cites work
- An analytics approach to the FIFA ranking procedure and the World Cup final draw
- Can strategizing in round-robin subtournaments be avoided?
- Comparing league formats with respect to match importance in Belgian football
- Comparing school choice and college admissions mechanisms by their strategic accessibility
- How to improve a team's position in the FIFA ranking? A simulation study
- Ranking soccer teams on the basis of their current strength: A comparison of maximum likelihood approaches
- Scheduling the South American qualifiers to the 2018 FIFA world cup by integer programming
- Strategic manipulation in tournament games
- When sports rules go awry
Cited in
(11)- Simulating the progression of a professional snooker frame
- How to design a multi-stage tournament when some results are carried over?
- Winning isn't everything: how sports competition rules can make you want to lose
- Fixing knockout tournaments with seeds
- Points scoring systems in Formula 1: a game theoretic perspective
- The efficacy of tournament designs
- League competitions and fairness
- Broadcasting revenue sharing after cancelling sports competitions
- How to avoid uncompetitive games? The importance of tie-breaking rules
- Football group draw probabilities and corrections
- Tournament schedules and incentives in a double round‐robin tournament with four teams
This page was built for publication: Quantifying incentive (in)compatibility: a case study from sports
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2672095)
