A comparison in terms of accuracy and efficiency between a MBS dynamic formulation with stress analysis and a non‐linear FEA code

DOI10.1002/nme.191zbMath1023.74044OpenAlexW1977150075MaRDI QIDQ2745430

P. Morer, R. Gutiérrez, Javier Cuadrado, Miguel Á. Naya

Publication date: 2001

Published in: International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.191

zbMATH Keywords

finite element analysis large displacement finite rotations CAD software computer-aided design flexible multibody dynamic analysis

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Computational methods for problems pertaining to mechanics of particles and systems (70-08) Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics (74S05) Dynamics of multibody systems (70E55) Thin bodies, structures (74Kxx)

Related Items (6)

Non-intrusive parallelization of multibody system dynamic simulations ⋮ Efficient coupling of multibody software with numerical computing environments and block diagram simulators ⋮ Efficient and accurate modeling of rigid rods ⋮ A benchmarking system for MBS simulation software: problem standardization and performance measurement ⋮ Hardware acceleration of multibody simulations for real-time embedded applications ⋮ On the effect of linear algebra implementations in real-time multibody system dynamics

This page was built for publication: A comparison in terms of accuracy and efficiency between a MBS dynamic formulation with stress analysis and a non‐linear FEA code