Feasible sets, comparative risk aversion, and comparative uncertainty aversion in bargaining

DOI10.1016/J.JMATECO.2016.06.003zbMATH Open1368.91107OpenAlexW2283044280MaRDI QIDQ343141FDOQ343141

Authors: Bram Driesen, Michele Lombardi, Hans Peters 

Publication date: 25 November 2016

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/ws/files/14388584/6233113.pdf

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3970421
• The effect of decision weights in bargaining problems.
• Risk aversion in the Nash bargaining problem with uncertainty
• Bargaining under uncertainty and the monotone path solutions
• Risk aversion in \(n\)-person bargaining

zbMATH Keywords

bargainingsubjective expected utilityChoquet expected utilitycomparative risk aversioncomparative uncertainty aversion

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models (91B26) Utility theory (91B16)

Cites Work

• The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk
• Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms
• The bargaining problem
• Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Other Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problem
• Proportional Solutions to Bargaining Situations: Interpersonal Utility Comparisons
• Integral Representation Without Additivity
• Ambiguity made precise: A comparative foundation
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Concavifiability and constructions of concave utility functions
• The effect of decision weights in bargaining problems.
• On risk aversion and bargaining outcomes.
• Bargaining solutions without the expected utility hypothesis
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Risk Aversion and Nash's Solution for Bargaining Games with Risky Outcomes
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Risk Aversion in the Nash Bargaining Problem with Risky Outcomes and Risky Disagreement Points
• A Criterion for Comparing Strength of Preference with an Application to Bargaining
• On the Interpretation of the Nash Bargaining Solution and Its Extension to Non-Expected Utility Preferences

Cited In (4)

• On the axiomatic theory of bargaining: a survey of recent results
• Partially-honest Nash implementation: a full characterization
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Effect of reduced opportunities on bargaining outcomes: an experiment with status asymmetries

This page was built for publication: Feasible sets, comparative risk aversion, and comparative uncertainty aversion in bargaining

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q343141)