Merging of opinions and probability kinematics
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3459082
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3737329 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 52447 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1416652 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3054843 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3060434 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3087284 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3090557 (Why is no real title available?)
- Agreeing to disagree
- An approach to consensus and certainty with increasing evidence
- Conditionalization and observation
- Consistent Bayesian aggregation
- Finitely additive conditional probabilities, conglomerability and disintegrations
- Merging of Opinions with Increasing Information
- On existence and non-existence of proper, regular, conditional distributions
- On the consistency of Bayes estimates
- Probabilities over rich languages, testing and randomness
- Some finitely additive probability
- Weak and strong merging of opinions
Cited in
(16)- Jeffrey meets Kolmogorov. A general theory of conditioning
- Fragility of asymptotic agreement under Bayesian learning
- KOLMOGOROV CONDITIONALIZERS CAN BE DUTCH BOOKED (IF AND ONLY IF THEY ARE EVIDENTIALLY UNCERTAIN)
- On the truth-convergence of open-minded Bayesianism
- General properties of Bayesian learning as statistical inference determined by conditional expectations
- A Dutch book theorem and converse Dutch book theorem for Kolmogorov conditionalization
- Truth approximation, belief merging, and peer disagreement
- Merging and testing opinions
- Weak and strong merging of opinions
- A new argument for Kolomogorov conditionalization
- Bounds on the probability of radically different opinions
- Distention for Sets of Probabilities
- Having a look at the Bayes blind spot
- Learning and pooling, pooling and learning
- On the role of explanatory and systematic power in scientific reasoning
- Putnam's diagonal argument and the impossibility of a universal learning machine
This page was built for publication: Merging of opinions and probability kinematics
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3459082)