A choice for `me' or for `us'? Using we-reasoning to predict cooperation and coordination in games

DOI10.1007/S11238-011-9270-7zbMATH Open1260.91051OpenAlexW2169737721MaRDI QIDQ453650FDOQ453650

Authors: David J. Butler 

Publication date: 27 September 2012

Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/9073/

Recommendations

• Theory of mind predicts cooperative behavior
• Social norms and cooperation
• Explaining cooperation in the finitely repeated simultaneous and sequential prisoner's dilemma game under incomplete and complete information
• Social preferences, positive expectations, and trust based cooperation
• Game theory and reciprocity in some extensive form experimental games

zbMATH Keywords

experimentprisoner's dilemmahi-lowe-reasoning

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Cooperative games (91A12) Experimental studies (91A90)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty
• A theory of sequential reciprocity
• The Algebra of Assortative Encounters and the Evolution of Cooperation
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (2)

• Team reasoning and the rational choice of payoff-dominant outcomes in games
• Theory of mind predicts cooperative behavior

This page was built for publication: A choice for `me' or for `us'? Using we-reasoning to predict cooperation and coordination in games

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q453650)