A choice for `me' or for `us'? Using we-reasoning to predict cooperation and coordination in games

DOI10.1007/S11238-011-9270-7MaRDI QIDQ453650zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors David J. Butler

Publication date 27 September 2012

Published in Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/9073/

zbMATH Keywords

experimentprisoner's dilemmahi-lowe-reasoning

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Cooperative games (91A12) Experimental studies (91A90)

Recommendations

• Theory of mind predicts cooperative behavior
• Social norms and cooperation
• Explaining cooperation in the finitely repeated simultaneous and sequential prisoner's dilemma game under incomplete and complete information
• Social preferences, positive expectations, and trust based cooperation
• Game theory and reciprocity in some extensive form experimental games

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 54099 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3087284 (Why is no real title available?)
• A theory of sequential reciprocity
• Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty
• The Algebra of Assortative Encounters and the Evolution of Cooperation

Cited in

(2)

• Team reasoning and the rational choice of payoff-dominant outcomes in games
• Theory of mind predicts cooperative behavior

This page was built for publication: A choice for `me' or for `us'? Using we-reasoning to predict cooperation and coordination in games

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q453650)