Approximation and parameterized complexity of minimax approval voting

From MaRDI portal
Publication:4558792

DOI10.1613/JAIR.1.11253zbMATH Open1451.68130arXiv1607.07906OpenAlexW2903252999WikidataQ128873806 ScholiaQ128873806MaRDI QIDQ4558792FDOQ4558792


Authors: Marek Cygan, Łukasz Kowalik, Arkadiusz Socała, Krzysztof Sornat Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 30 November 2018

Published in: Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We present three results on the complexity of Minimax Approval Voting. First, we study Minimax Approval Voting parameterized by the Hamming distance d from the solution to the votes. We show Minimax Approval Voting admits no algorithm running in time mathcalOstar(2o(dlogd)), unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. This means that the mathcalOstar(d2d) algorithm of Misra et al. [AAMAS 2015] is essentially optimal. Motivated by this, we then show a parameterized approximation scheme, running in time mathcalOstar(left(3/epsilonight)2d), which is essentially tight assuming ETH. Finally, we get a new polynomial-time randomized approximation scheme for Minimax Approval Voting, which runs in time nmathcalO(1/epsilon2cdotlog(1/epsilon))cdotmathrmpoly(m), almost matching the running time of the fastest known PTAS for Closest String due to Ma and Sun [SIAM J. Comp. 2009].


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.07906




Recommendations





Cited In (6)





This page was built for publication: Approximation and parameterized complexity of minimax approval voting

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4558792)