How portable is level-0 behavior? A test of level-k theory in games with non-neutral frames

DOI10.3982/ECTA11132MaRDI QIDQ4615871zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Shaun Hargreaves Heap, David Rojo Arjona, Robert Sugden

Publication date 29 January 2019

Published in Econometrica (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

coordinationlevel-\(k\) theoryhide and seekdiscoordination

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Positional games (pursuit and evasion, etc.) (91A24)

Recommendations

• Out of your mind: eliciting individual reasoning in one shot games
• Elicited salience and salience-based level-\(k\)
• On the persistence of strategic sophistication
• Level-\(k\) reasoning in a generalized beauty contest
• Level-0 models for predicting human behavior in games

Cited in

(10)

• Stake size and the power of focal points in coordination games: experimental evidence
• Variable-frame level-\(n\) theory
• Do people minimize regret in strategic situations? A level-k comparison
• On the empirical validity of axioms in unstructured bargaining
• Elicited salience and salience-based level-\(k\)
• Team reasoning and the rational choice of payoff-dominant outcomes in games
• Inspired and inspiring: Hervé Moulin and the discovery of the beauty contest game
• Predicting human behavior in unrepeated, simultaneous-move games
• Failing to utilize potentially effective focal points: prominence can stymie coordination on distinct actions
• Overcoming coordination failure in games with focal points: an experimental investigation

This page was built for publication: How portable is level-0 behavior? A test of level-\(k\) theory in games with non-neutral frames

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4615871)