A Curve‐Free Method for Phase I Clinical Trials

From MaRDI portal
Publication:4667490

DOI10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00609.xzbMath1060.62611OpenAlexW2080277472WikidataQ52076810 ScholiaQ52076810MaRDI QIDQ4667490

Jeffrey R. Eisele, Mauro Gasparini

Publication date: 20 April 2005

Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00609.x




Related Items

Sequential Monte Carlo for Bayesian sequentially designed experiments for discrete dataAn application of reinforced urn processes to determining maximum tolerated doseA Latent Contingency Table Approach to Dose Finding for Combinations of Two AgentsImpact of different model structure and prior distribution in continual reassessment methodEscalation with overdose control using ordinal toxicity grades for cancer phase I clinical trialsStochastic approximation and modern model-based designs for dose-finding clinical trialsContinual reassessment and related dose-finding designsIncorporating a patient dichotomous characteristic in cancer phase I clinical trials using escalation with overdose controlAdaptive clinical trial designs for phase I cancer studiesDesign efficiency in dose finding studiesThe treatment versus experimentation dilemma in dose finding studiesOn the Use of Nonparametric Curves in Phase I Trials with Low Toxicity ToleranceCurve-Free and Model-Based Continual Reassessment Method DesignsA Simple Technique to Evaluate Model Sensitivity in the Continual Reassessment MethodBayesian Optimal Designs for Phase I Clinical TrialsEM-type algorithms for computing restricted MLEs in multivariate normal distributions and multivariatet-distributionsFlexible link continual reassessment methods for trivariate binary outcome phase I/II trialsA comparative study of the dose-response analysis with application to the target dose estimationBayesian hierarchical random-effects meta-analysis and design of phase I clinical trialsBayesian Dose-Finding in Phase I/II Clinical Trials Using Toxicity and Efficacy Odds Ratios



Cites Work