Interpreting enthymematic arguments using belief revision

DOI10.1007/S11229-013-0248-6zbMATH Open1310.03004OpenAlexW2071752982MaRDI QIDQ484907FDOQ484907

Authors Georg Brun, Hans Rott

Publication date 8 January 2015

Published in Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/75292

zbMATH Keywords

interpretationbelief revisionargumentcharityenthymeme

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42)

Recommendations

• A relevance-theoretic framework for constructing and deconstructing enthymemes
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5560595
• The three bases for the enthymeme: A dialogical theory
• Belief revision and argumentation: a reasoning process view
• Argumentation, reasoning, and belief revision

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5560595 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3641411 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1269567 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1852914 (Why is no real title available?)
• Control System Dynamics
• Distance semantics for belief revision
• Distance semantics for database repair
• Formalization and the objects of logic
• Iterated revision and minimal change of conditional beliefs
• Knowledge in flux. Modeling the dynamics of epistemic states
• Measuring similarity in belief revision
• Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
• On the Ramsey test without triviality
• Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change
• Reapproaching Ramsey: conditionals and iterated belief change in the spirit of AGM
• Shifting Priorities: Simple Representations for Twenty-Seven Iterated Theory Change Operators

Cited in

(3)

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5560595 (Why is no real title available?)
• The three bases for the enthymeme: A dialogical theory
• A relevance-theoretic framework for constructing and deconstructing enthymemes

This page was built for publication: Interpreting enthymematic arguments using belief revision

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q484907)