Interpreting enthymematic arguments using belief revision

DOI10.1007/S11229-013-0248-6zbMATH Open1310.03004OpenAlexW2071752982MaRDI QIDQ484907FDOQ484907

Authors: Georg Brun, Hans Rott 

Publication date: 8 January 2015

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/75292

Recommendations

• A relevance-theoretic framework for constructing and deconstructing enthymemes
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5560595
• The three bases for the enthymeme: A dialogical theory
• Belief revision and argumentation: a reasoning process view
• Argumentation, reasoning, and belief revision

zbMATH Keywords

interpretationbelief revisionargumentcharityenthymeme

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change
• Distance semantics for belief revision
• Shifting Priorities: Simple Representations for Twenty-Seven Iterated Theory Change Operators
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
• Iterated revision and minimal change of conditional beliefs
• Distance semantics for database repair
• Control System Dynamics
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Measuring similarity in belief revision
• Reapproaching Ramsey: conditionals and iterated belief change in the spirit of AGM
• Formalization and the objects of logic
• On the Ramsey test without triviality

Cited In (2)

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The three bases for the enthymeme: A dialogical theory

This page was built for publication: Interpreting enthymematic arguments using belief revision

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q484907)