Decentralized update selection with semi-strategic experts
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6109537
DOI10.1007/978-3-031-15714-1_23zbMATH Open1524.68020arXiv2205.08407OpenAlexW4297821675MaRDI QIDQ6109537FDOQ6109537
Authors: Georgios Amanatidis, Georgios Birmpas, Philip Lazos, Francisco J. Marmolejo-Cossío
Publication date: 28 July 2023
Published in: Algorithmic Game Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: Motivated by governance models adopted in blockchain applications, we study the problem of selecting appropriate system updates in a decentralised way. Contrary to most existing voting approaches, we use the input of a set of motivated experts of varying levels of expertise. In particular, we develop an approval voting inspired selection mechanism through which the experts approve or disapprove the different updates according to their perception of the quality of each alternative. Given their opinions, and weighted by their expertise level, a single update is then implemented and evaluated, and the experts receive rewards based on their choices. We show that this mechanism always has approximate pure Nash equilibria and that these achieve a constant factor approximation with respect to the quality benchmark of the optimal alternative. Finally, we study the repeated version of the problem, where the weights of the experts are adjusted after each update, according to their performance. Under mild assumptions about the weights, the extension of our mechanism still has approximate pure Nash equilibria in this setting.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.08407
Recommendations
Cites Work
- Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation
- Worst-case equilibria
- The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information
- A Non-cooperative Equilibrium for Supergames
- Elicitation of Personal Probabilities and Expectations
- The Price of Stability for Network Design with Fair Cost Allocation
- Handbook on approval voting
- Approval voting, Borda winners, and Condorcet winners: evidence from seven elections
- Robust incentives for information acquisition
- Sincerity and manipulation under approval voting
- Going from Theory to Practice: The Mixed Success of Approval Voting
- A Strategic Analysis of Nonranked Voting Systems
- Decentralized update selection with semi-strategic experts
Cited In (1)
This page was built for publication: Decentralized update selection with semi-strategic experts
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6109537)