Decentralized update selection with semi-strategic experts

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6109537

DOI10.1007/978-3-031-15714-1_23zbMATH Open1524.68020arXiv2205.08407OpenAlexW4297821675MaRDI QIDQ6109537FDOQ6109537


Authors: Georgios Amanatidis, Georgios Birmpas, Philip Lazos, Francisco J. Marmolejo-Cossío Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 28 July 2023

Published in: Algorithmic Game Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Motivated by governance models adopted in blockchain applications, we study the problem of selecting appropriate system updates in a decentralised way. Contrary to most existing voting approaches, we use the input of a set of motivated experts of varying levels of expertise. In particular, we develop an approval voting inspired selection mechanism through which the experts approve or disapprove the different updates according to their perception of the quality of each alternative. Given their opinions, and weighted by their expertise level, a single update is then implemented and evaluated, and the experts receive rewards based on their choices. We show that this mechanism always has approximate pure Nash equilibria and that these achieve a constant factor approximation with respect to the quality benchmark of the optimal alternative. Finally, we study the repeated version of the problem, where the weights of the experts are adjusted after each update, according to their performance. Under mild assumptions about the weights, the extension of our mechanism still has approximate pure Nash equilibria in this setting.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.08407




Recommendations



Cites Work


Cited In (1)





This page was built for publication: Decentralized update selection with semi-strategic experts

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6109537)