Divide and choose: an informationally robust strategic approach to bankruptcy problems
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6114947
DOI10.1016/j.jmateco.2023.102862zbMath1521.91151MaRDI QIDQ6114947
Publication date: 15 August 2023
Published in: Journal of Mathematical Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Games in extensive form (91A18) Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32) Equilibrium refinements (91A11)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Axiomatic and strategic justifications for the constrained equal benefits rule in the airport problem
- Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
- A noncooperative justification for egalitarian surplus sharing
- A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
- A noncooperative view of consistent bankruptcy rules
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- Relations among the central rules in bankruptcy problems: a strategic perspective
- A study of the nucleolus in the nested cost-sharing problem: axiomatic and strategic perspectives
- Strategic bargaining, surplus sharing problems and the nucleolus
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update
- A quadratic programming model for product configuration optimization
- The Nucleolus of a Characteristic Function Game
This page was built for publication: Divide and choose: an informationally robust strategic approach to bankruptcy problems