Heegaard Floer homology as morphism spaces

From MaRDI portal
Publication:654917



Abstract: In this paper we prove another pairing theorem for bordered Floer homology. Unlike the original pairing theorem, this one is stated in terms of homomorphisms, not tensor products. The present formulation is closer in spirit to the usual TQFT framework, and allows a more direct comparison with Fukaya-categorical constructions. The result also leads to various dualities in bordered Floer homology.


Heegaard Floer Theory contains a wealth of geometric information about closed \(4\)-manifolds. However, much of it is not yet algorithmically computable, and existing computations seem ad-hoc. This paper is a step in the road to transforming Heegaard Floer homology into a computable invariant. Conjecturally, Heegaard Floer Theory is equivalent to Seiberg--Witten theory, having an underlying TQFT that is equivalent to Seiberg-Witten (monopole) TQFT. This TQFT should extend down to surfaces. In [``Bordered Heegaard Floer homology: Invariance and pairing, \url{arXiv:0810.0687}], the authors examined consequences of this conjectural extension for the weakest version of Heegaard Floer Theory, known as the `hat' theory. This theory already gives rise to invariants which are strong enough to give interesting information about underlying \(3\)-manifolds, such as detecting minimal genera of embedded surfaces. In that paper, the authors extended Heegaard Floer homology \(\widehat{HF}(Y)\) with coefficients in \(\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\) to \(3\)-manifolds with boundary. To a surface \(F\), together with a handle decomposition \(\mathcal{Z}\) of \(F\) and a basepoint, they associated a differential graded algebra \(\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{Z})\). Auroux subsequently showed that \(\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{Z})\) is Morita equivalent to a certain version of the Fukaya category of \(F\) [\textit{D. Auroux}, ``Fukaya categories and bordered Heegaard-Floer homology, in: R. Bhatia (ed.) et al., Proceedings of the international congress of mathematicians (ICM 2010), Hyderabad, India. Vol. II: Invited lectures. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific; New Delhi: Hindustan Book Agency. 917--941 (2011; Zbl 1275.53082)]. To a \(3\)-manifold \(Y\) with boundary parametrized by \(\mathcal{Z}\), the authors associated a right \(A_\infty\) module \(\widehat{CFA}(Y)\) and a left differential graded module \(\widehat{CFD}(Y)\). The principal result of that paper was the pairing theorem: \[ \widehat{HF}(Y_1\cup_F Y_2)\simeq H_\ast\left(\widehat{CFA}(Y_1)\tilde{\otimes}\widehat{CFD}(Y_2)\right). \] The main result of this paper is a different pairing theorem (Theorem 1): \[ \begin{multlined}\widehat{HF}(-Y_1\cup_F Y_2) \simeq H_\ast\left(\mathrm{Mor}_{\mathcal{A}(-\mathcal{Z})}\left(\widehat{CFD}(Y_1),\widehat{CFD}(Y_2)\right)\right)\\ \simeq H_\ast\left(\mathrm{Mor}_{\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{Z})}\left(\widehat{CFA}(Y_1),\widehat{CFA}(Y_2)\right)\right).\end{multlined} \] Above, \(-\mathcal{Z}\) denotes orientation reversal. This version of the pairing theorem has the advantage that \(\widehat{CFD}\) is typically easier to compute than \(\widehat{CFA}\), cf. the authors' paper [``Computing \(\widehat{HF}\) by factoring mapping classes, \url{arXiv:1010.2550}], and also that it meshes better with the Fukaya-categorical formulation of Lagrangian Floer homology. The authors next prove a variety of duality theorems having to do with the behaviour of these modules under orientation reversal (Theorem 2), conjugation of \(\text{spin}^c\) structure (Theorem 3), and reversing the Morse function on the surface (Theorem 13). They also prove analogues of Theorems 1 and 2 for bimodules, which are assigned to bordered \(3\)-manifolds with two boundary components.




Cited in
(42)








This page was built for publication: Heegaard Floer homology as morphism spaces

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q654917)