Testing subgame perfection apart from fairness in ultimatum games

DOI10.1007/S10683-006-0064-7MaRDI QIDQ862841zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors James Andreoni, Emily Blanchard

Publication date 24 January 2007

Published in Experimental Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-0064-7

zbMATH Keywords

fairnesslearningsubgame perfectionutimatum game

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Experimental studies (91A90) Rationality and learning in game theory (91A26)

Recommendations

• Subgame perfection in ultimatum bargaining trees
• Learning to be imperfect: The ultimatum game
• Fairness in simple bargaining experiments
• Expectations and fairness in a simple bargaining experiment
• Adaptive learning versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining

Cites work

• A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
• Adaptive learning versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining
• Experience-weighted Attraction Learning in Normal Form Games
• Inference by Believers in the Law of Small Numbers
• Learning in High Stakes Ultimatum Games: An Experiment in the Slovak Republic
• Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term
• Learning to be imperfect: The ultimatum game

Cited in

(5)

• Estimation of finite sequential games
• Subgame perfection in ultimatum bargaining trees
• Learning to be imperfect: The ultimatum game
• A case of evolutionarily stable attainable equilibrium in the laboratory
• Bargaining over a climate deal: deadline and delay

This page was built for publication: Testing subgame perfection apart from fairness in ultimatum games

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q862841)