Totality, determinism and functionality problems in (incomplete) abstract argumentation frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- Abstract argumentation frameworks with strong and weak constraints
- Acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support
- Argumentation in artificial intelligence
- Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations
- Coherence in finite argument systems.
- Complete extensions in argumentation coincide with 3-valued stable models in logic programming
- Complexity of fundamental problems in probabilistic abstract argumentation: beyond independence
- Complexity of nonemptiness in control argumentation frameworks
- Complexity of Possible and Necessary Existence Problems in Abstract Argumentation
- Complexity of semi-stable and stage semantics in argumentation frameworks
- Computational Complexity of Semi-stable Semantics in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
- Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks
- Constraints and lifting-based (conditional) preferences in abstract argumentation
- Credulous acceptance in high-order argumentation frameworks with necessities: an incremental approach
- Credulous and skeptical acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Explainable acceptance in probabilistic and incomplete abstract argumentation frameworks
- Graph theoretical structures in logic programs and default theories
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 610968 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7368407 (Why is no real title available?)
- Incremental computation for structured argumentation over dynamic DeLP knowledge bases
- Incremental computation of deterministic extensions for dynamic argumentation frameworks
- Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
- Multiple total stable models are definitely needed to solve unique solution problems
- On efficiently estimating the probability of extensions in abstract argumentation frameworks
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- On the complexity of probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks
- On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics
- On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
- Possible controllability of control argumentation frameworks
- Probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks, a possible world view
- Relevance for stability of verification status of a set of arguments in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Revisiting the notions of extension and acceptance over incomplete abstract argumentation frameworks
- Stability of extensions in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Structure-based semantics of argumentation frameworks with higher-order attacks and supports
- The complexity of computing the permanent
- Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks
This page was built for publication: Totality, determinism and functionality problems in (incomplete) abstract argumentation frameworks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q7286320)