Graph theoretical structures in logic programs and default theories

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 09:21, 30 January 2024 by Import240129110113 (talk | contribs) (Created automatically from import240129110113)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Publication:672050

DOI10.1016/S0304-3975(96)80707-9zbMath0874.68190MaRDI QIDQ672050

Yannis Dimopoulos, Alberto Torres

Publication date: 27 February 1997

Published in: Theoretical Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)




Related Items (45)

Backdoors to SatisfactionComplexity of nonemptiness in control argumentation frameworksOn rejected arguments and implicit conflicts: the hidden power of argumentation semanticsLabellings for assumption-based and abstract argumentationA nondeterministic well-founded semanticsLattice point of view for argumentation frameworkImproved answer-set programming encodings for abstract argumentationThe complexity landscape of claim-augmented argumentation frameworksOn the preferred extensions of argumentation frameworks: bijections with naive setsCharacteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentationFinding kernels or solving SATAnalyzing the computational complexity of abstract dialectical frameworks via approximation fixpoint theoryTaking into account ``who said what in abstract argumentation: complexity resultsLayerings of logic programs -- layer decomposable semantics and incremental model computationPreferred extensions as stable modelsKernels in digraphs that are not kernel perfectAn extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentationPropositional discourse logicComplexity-sensitive decision procedures for abstract argumentationVerification in incomplete argumentation frameworksAcceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworksTowards fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for abstract argumentationAugmenting tractable fragments of abstract argumentationWhat Is a Reasonable Argumentation Semantics?Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity resultsOn the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instanceAnswering the “why” in answer set programming – A survey of explanation approachesDesign and results of the second international competition on computational models of argumentationEMIL: extracting meaning from inconsistent language. Towards argumentation using a controlled natural language interfaceGraph-classes of argumentation frameworks with collective attacksAudiences in argumentation frameworksArgumentation in artificial intelligenceComputational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraintsHandling controversial argumentsOpposition FrameworksStrong inconsistencyComplexity of fundamental problems in probabilistic abstract argumentation: beyond independenceThe computational complexity of ideal semanticsComplexity of abstract argumentation under a claim-centric viewAlternative foundations for Reiter's default logicCoherence in finite argument systems.On the equivalence and range of applicability of graph-based representations of logic programs.Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a surveyIndepth combinatorial analysis of admissible sets for abstract argumentationTwo party immediate response disputes: Properties and efficiency




Cites Work




This page was built for publication: Graph theoretical structures in logic programs and default theories