Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman have agreed on testing? (With comments and a rejoinder).

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 18:03, 31 January 2024 by Import240129110113 (talk | contribs) (Created automatically from import240129110113)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Publication:1431216

DOI10.1214/SS/1056397485zbMath1048.62006OpenAlexW2038290376WikidataQ29014007 ScholiaQ29014007MaRDI QIDQ1431216

James O. Berger

Publication date: 27 May 2004

Published in: Statistical Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1056397485




Related Items (38)

Bayesian and frequentist evidence in one-sided hypothesis testingAssigning probabilities to hypotheses in the context of a binomial distributionRejection odds and rejection ratios: a proposal for statistical practice in testing hypothesesHypothesis Testing in Presence of AdversariesReconnecting p-Value and Posterior Probability Under One- and Two-Sided TestsTheoretical and empirical distributions of the \(p\) valueStatistics between inductive logic and empirical scienceFrequentist-Bayesian Monte Carlo testingConfidence-credible intervalsBalancing producer and consumer risks in optimal attribute testing: a unified Bayesian/frequentist designAspects of FrequentismA Statistical Model to Investigate the Reproducibility Rate Based on Replication ExperimentsNon-Experimental Data, Hypothesis Testing, and the Likelihood Principle: A Social Science PerspectiveNeyman–Pearson lemma for Bayes factorsError and inference: an outsider stand on a frequentist philosophyWhat type of Type I error? Contrasting the Neyman-Pearson and Fisherian approaches in the context of exact and direct replicationsSimple strategies for semi-supervised feature selectionThe widespread misinterpretation ofp-values as error probabilitiesBayesian checking of the second levels of hierarchical modelsSelf-consistent confidence sets and tests of composite hypotheses applicable to restricted parametersStatistical properties of the fuzzy \(p\)-valueFrequentist properties of Bayesian inequality testsPower analysis and type I and type II error rates of Bayesian nonparametric two-sample tests for location-shifts based on the Bayes factor under Cauchy priorsOn the correspondence between frequentist and Bayesian testsSimple relation between Bayesian order-restricted and point-null hypothesis testsSimple ancillariesThe interplay of Bayesian and frequentist analysisA conversation with James O. BergerHypothesis testing for topological data analysisWilcoxon-Mann-Whitney or t-test? On assumptions for hypothesis tests and multiple interpretations of decision rulesConsensus priors for multinomial and binomial ratiosBayesian hypothesis testing: reduxInterpreting \(p\)-values and confidence intervals using well-calibrated null preference priorsAn Introduction to Second-Generation p-ValuesMultiple Perspectives on Inference for Two Simple Statistical ScenariosAdvantages of Variance StabilizationProbabilistic inference for multiple testingDiscussion: Bayesian Methods: Applied? Yes. Philosophical Defense? In Flux




Cites Work




This page was built for publication: Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman have agreed on testing? (With comments and a rejoinder).