Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 00:05, 3 February 2024 by Import240129110113 (talk | contribs) (Created automatically from import240129110113)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Publication:2457643

DOI10.1016/j.artint.2005.07.002zbMath1131.68103OpenAlexW2084827335MaRDI QIDQ2457643

Robert Kowalski, Francesca Toni, Phan Minh Dung

Publication date: 23 October 2007

Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2005.07.002




Related Items (46)

Measure-Based Inconsistency-Tolerant Maintenance of Database IntegrityCollaborative vs. Conflicting Learning, Evolution and ArgumentationNormal and strong expansion equivalence for argumentation frameworksToward incremental computation of argumentation semantics: a decomposition-based approachLabellings for assumption-based and abstract argumentationInference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentationApproved Models for Normal Logic ProgramsForecasting with jury-based probabilistic argumentationHarnessing Incremental Answer Set Solving for Reasoning in Assumption-Based ArgumentationJustifying answer sets using argumentationSimple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworksLogical argumentation by dynamic proof systemsFundamental properties of attack relations in structured argumentation with prioritiesSemantic-based construction of arguments: an answer set programming approachFlexible dispute derivations with forward and backward arguments for assumption-based argumentationExplanations of non-monotonic inference in admissibility-based abstract argumentationInstantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and propertiesAlgorithms for generating arguments and counterarguments in propositional logicDynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based methodA general framework for sound assumption-based argumentation dialoguesPreferences and Assumption-Based Argumentation for Conflict-Free Normative AgentsRevealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applicationsUses and computation of imprecise probabilities from statistical data and expert argumentsReasoning on the Web with Assumption-Based ArgumentationAssumption-Based Argumentation for Selection and Composition of ServicesAn argument-based approach to reasoning with clinical knowledgeAlgorithms for Effective Argumentation in Classical Propositional Logic: A Connection Graph ApproachInconsistency-Tolerant Integrity Checking for Knowledge AssimilationA review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistencyAn Algorithm for Generating Arguments in Classical Predicate LogicReasoning about Exceptions to ContractsAnswers that Have IntegrityPartial Semantics of ArgumentationArgument-Based Decision Making and Negotiation in E-Business: Contracting a Land Lease for a Computer Assembly PlantEvaluating dialectical structuresAudiences in argumentation frameworksArgumentation in artificial intelligenceComputing ideal sceptical argumentationComputational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraintsModelling last-act attempted crime in criminal lawThe computational complexity of ideal semanticsEncoding deductive argumentation in quantified Boolean formulaeMethods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a surveyAssumption-based argumentation for extended disjunctive logic programmingArgument graphs and assumption-based argumentationProbabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation




Cites Work




This page was built for publication: Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation