A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2494027
DOI10.1007/S00199-005-0636-3zbMath1107.91057OpenAlexW2053301247WikidataQ59972779 ScholiaQ59972779MaRDI QIDQ2494027
William Thomson, Diego Domínguez
Publication date: 16 June 2006
Published in: Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://rcer.econ.rochester.edu/RCERPAPERS/rcer_511.pdf
Related Items (22)
Taxation and poverty ⋮ The TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems ⋮ New characterizations of a classical bankruptcy rule ⋮ A new approach for bounding awards in bankruptcy problems ⋮ Strategic justifications of the TAL family of rules for bankruptcy problems ⋮ ERRATUM: "BANKRUPTCY RULES AND COALITIONAL MANIPULATION" ⋮ Random conjugates of bankruptcy rules ⋮ Reflecting inequality of claims in gains and losses ⋮ A unifying framework for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims ⋮ Resource allocations with guaranteed awards in claims problems ⋮ A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims ⋮ Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims ⋮ Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims ⋮ A characterization of optimistic weighted Shapley rules in minimum cost spanning tree problems ⋮ Lower bounds and recursive methods for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims ⋮ Secured lower bound, composition up, and minimal rights first for bankruptcy problems ⋮ On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach ⋮ Families of sequential priority rules and random arrival rules with withdrawal limits ⋮ A proportional approach to claims problems with a guaranteed minimum ⋮ Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims ⋮ Constrained stochastic cost allocation ⋮ Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update
This page was built for publication: A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims