Introduction to Meta‐Analysis
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3617341
DOI10.1002/9780470743386zbMath1178.62001OpenAlexW4297918764WikidataQ106417732 ScholiaQ106417732MaRDI QIDQ3617341
Hannah R. Rothstein, Michael Borenstein, Julian P. T. Higgins, Larry V. Hedges
Publication date: 23 March 2009
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386
Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Introductory exposition (textbooks, tutorial papers, etc.) pertaining to statistics (62-01)
Related Items (43)
A selective review of statistical methods using calibration information from similar studies ⋮ Selecting an augmented random effects model ⋮ Random Effects Coefficient of Determination for Mixed and Meta-Analysis Models ⋮ A simple test for the difference of means in meta-analysis when study-specific variances are unreported ⋮ Pitfalls of significance testing and \(p\)-value variability: an econometrics perspective ⋮ Likelihood-ratio-test methods for drug safety signal detection from multiple clinical datasets ⋮ Hoeffding-Blum-Kiefer-Rosenblatt independence test statistic on partly not identically distributed data ⋮ Bayesian approach to the meta-analysis of multi-category prevalence ⋮ An effect size for variance heterogeneity in meta-analysis ⋮ Evaluation of a new version of I2 with emphasis on diagnostic problems ⋮ Objective Bayesian Nets for Integrating Consistent Datasets ⋮ Some general points on the \(I^2\)-measure of heterogeneity in meta-analysis ⋮ Relative efficiency of using summary versus individual data in random‐effects meta‐analysis ⋮ Scientific self-correction: the Bayesian way ⋮ Applied meta‐analysis with R and Stata. Ding‐GengChen, Karl E.Peace (2021). Boca Raton, FL, Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, 2nd ed., 456 pages. ISBN 9780367183837 ⋮ A comparison of bootstrap approaches for homogeneity test based on dichotomous outcome in meta-analysis ⋮ The diamond ratio: A visual indicator of the extent of heterogeneity in meta‐analysis ⋮ Heterogeneous heterogeneity by default: Testing categorical moderators in mixed‐effects meta‐analysis ⋮ Benefits of the implementation of supply chain finance ⋮ Confidence intervals for treatment effect from restricted maximum likelihood ⋮ An adjusted random-effects model for binary-data meta-analysis ⋮ Random‐effects meta‐analysis models for the odds ratio in the case of rare events under different data‐generating models: A simulation study ⋮ A theoretical investigation of how evidence flows in Bayesian network meta-analysis of disconnected networks ⋮ Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias ⋮ Outcome-wide longitudinal designs for causal inference: a new template for empirical studies ⋮ When should meta‐analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions? ⋮ Restricted likelihood representation and decision-theoretic aspects of meta-analysis ⋮ A nondegenerate penalized likelihood estimator for variance parameters in multilevel models ⋮ An evaluation of statistical methods for aggregate patterns of replication failure ⋮ Count outcome meta-analysis for comparing treatments by fusing mixed data sources: comparing interventions using across report information ⋮ Aggregating expert judgement ⋮ Rothman-Woodroofe symmetry test statistic revisited ⋮ Nonparametric estimation of effect heterogeneity in rare events meta-analysis: bivariate, discrete mixture model ⋮ Rejoinder on ``Data science, big data and statistics ⋮ A comparison of two varying coefficient meta-analysis methods for an average risk difference ⋮ General unbiased estimating equations for variance components in linear mixed models ⋮ Performance of the Peto odds ratio compared to the usual odds ratio estimator in the case of rare events ⋮ Investigating heterogeneity in meta-analysis of studies with rare events. Estimating the amount of heterogeneity ⋮ Nonparametric predictive inference for binary diagnostic tests ⋮ Nonparametric predictive inference with combined data under different right-censoring schemes ⋮ Estimation of effect heterogeneity in rare events meta-analysis ⋮ Publication bias in meta-analysis: confidence intervals for Rosenthal's fail-safe number ⋮ Data enriched linear regression
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Introduction to Meta‐Analysis
