Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Investigating the relationship between argumentation semantics via signatures
- On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
- What is a reasonable argumentation semantics?
Cites work
- On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
- Solving semantic problems with odd-length cycles in argumentation
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Cited in
(13)- On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
- Stratified belief bases revision with argumentative inference
- A logical account of formal argumentation
- Inductive defense for sceptical semantics of extended argumentation
- On rejected arguments and implicit conflicts: the hidden power of argumentation semantics
- Argumentation through a distributed self-stabilizing approach
- A brief introduction to the Shkop approach to conflict resolution in formal argumentation
- Investigating the relationship between argumentation semantics via signatures
- Inference from Controversial Arguments
- Logics in Artificial Intelligence
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Merging operators on stratified belief bases equipped with argumentative inference
- Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics
This page was built for publication: Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3524931)
