Comparing five statistical methods of differential methylation identification using bisulfite sequencing data
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- A hidden Markov model for identifying differentially methylated sites in bisulfite sequencing data
- HMM-DM: identifying differentially methylated regions using a hidden Markov model
- A Bayesian hidden Markov model for detecting differentially methylated regions
- HMM-Fisher: identifying differential methylation using a hidden Markov model and Fisher's exact test
- MethCP: differentially methylated region detection with change point models
Cites work
- A Direct Approach to False Discovery Rates
- Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate
- False Discovery Rates for Spatial Signals
- HMM-DM: identifying differentially methylated regions using a hidden Markov model
- HMM-Fisher: identifying differential methylation using a hidden Markov model and Fisher's exact test
- Multiple Hypotheses Testing with Weights
- Statistical significance for genomewide studies
Cited in
(5)- MethCP: differentially methylated region detection with change point models
- A hidden Markov model for identifying differentially methylated sites in bisulfite sequencing data
- A novel statistical method for modeling covariate effects in bisulfite sequencing derived measures of DNA methylation
- HMM-Fisher: identifying differential methylation using a hidden Markov model and Fisher's exact test
- HMM-DM: identifying differentially methylated regions using a hidden Markov model
Describes a project that uses
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Comparing five statistical methods of differential methylation identification using bisulfite sequencing data
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q306686)
