Intermediate preferences and Rawlsian arbitration rules

DOI10.1007/BF00187429MaRDI QIDQ1208121zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Yves Sprumont

Publication date 16 May 1993

Published in Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187429

zbMATH Keywords

granding principleintermediate preferencesPareto optimal rules

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Voting theory (91B12) Social choice (91B14)

Recommendations

• Two egalitarian consensus rules
• Group choice rules in problems with interpersonal preference comparisons
• Compromising as an equal loss principle
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1143643
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1081145

Cited in

(8)

• Bidding games and efficient allocations
• On the subgame perfect implementability of voting rules
• Fair allocation of indivisible goods: the two-agent case
• Compromising as an equal loss principle
• Negotiation strategies for agents with ordinal preferences: theoretical analysis and human study
• Two principles for two-person social choice
• Arbiter assignment
• Bargaining through approval

This page was built for publication: Intermediate preferences and Rawlsian arbitration rules

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1208121)