Galois subfields of tame division algebras. (Q273106)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6571644
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Galois subfields of tame division algebras.
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6571644

      Statements

      Galois subfields of tame division algebras. (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      21 April 2016
      0 references
      Let \(F\) be a field and \(d(F)\) the class of associative finite-dimensional central division \(F\)-algebras. It is a well-known consequence of the classical Skolem-Noether theorem that an algebra \(D\in d(F)\) is a crossed product if and only if \(D\) possesses a maximal subfield which is a Galois extension of \(F\). When \(D\) does not possess such a maximal subfield, it is called a noncrossed product. By class field theory, \(D\) is necessarily a crossed product (more precisely, a cyclic \(F\)-algebra), if \(F\) is a global or local field. The question of whether there exist fields admitting noncrossed products had been open for about 40 years, when it was answered affirmatively by \textit{S. A. Amitsur} [Isr. J. Math. 12, 408-420 (1972; Zbl 0248.16006)]. This was specified by \textit{L. J. Risman} [Isr. J. Math. 28, 113-128 (1977; Zbl 0366.16006)], and in any prescribed characteristic by \textit{M. M. Schacher}, \textit{L. W. Small} [J. Algebra 24, 100-103 (1973; Zbl 0256.16013)] and \textit{D. J. Saltman} [J. Algebra 52, 302-314 (1978; Zbl 0391.13002)]. Subsequently, the existence of noncrossed products over more familiar fields was found by a number of authors, including Brussel, McKinnie, Tengan, Tignol, Jacob, Wadsworth, Hanke (references to their work can be found in the reviewed paper). The paper under review solves the crossed product problem in the case where \(F\) is endowed with a Henselian valuation \(v\), and \(D/F\) is tamely ramified (i.e. there is a tamely ramified finite extension of \(F\), which is a splitting field of \(D\)). Note that the Henselity of \(v\) ensures its extendability to a unique, up-to an equivalence, valuation \(v_\Delta\), on each finite-dimensional associative division \(F\)-algebra \(\Delta\). The main result of the reviewed paper solves the considered problem by showing that \(D\) is a crossed product if and only if the residue division \(\overline F\)-algebra \(\overline D\) of \((D,v_D)\), where \(\overline F\) is the residue field of \((F,v)\), contains as a maximal subfield a Galois extension of \(\overline F\). The proof of the ``only if'' implication relies on the theory of graded division algebras (presented by \textit{J.-P. Tignol} and \textit{A. R. Wadsworth} [Value functions on simple algebras, and associated graded rings. Cham: Springer (2015; Zbl 1357.16002)]). The authors deduce from the main result that \(d(F)\) consists of crossed products, provided that \(\overline F\) is a local field. The same follows in case the absolute Galois group of \(\overline F\) is a projective profinite group. When \(\overline F\) is a global field, the paper gives a description of the location of noncrossed products among tame division algebras, and leads to their discovery in new parts of the Brauer group.
      0 references
      central division algebras
      0 references
      Henselian fields
      0 references
      residue fields
      0 references
      tame division algebras
      0 references
      tame Brauer groups
      0 references
      crossed products
      0 references
      noncrossed products
      0 references
      maximal subfields
      0 references
      graded division algebras
      0 references
      associated graded fields
      0 references
      Galois subfields
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references