Generalized limits with additional invariance properties and their applications to noncommutative geometry (Q390768)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6243625
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Generalized limits with additional invariance properties and their applications to noncommutative geometry
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6243625

      Statements

      Generalized limits with additional invariance properties and their applications to noncommutative geometry (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      8 January 2014
      0 references
      Dixmier traces
      0 references
      measurable elements
      0 references
      generalized limits
      0 references
      Cesàro operator
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      Given a separable Hilbert space \(H\), denote by \(\mathcal{M}_{1,\infty}\) the ideal of all compact operators \(T:H \rightarrow H\) which satisfy NEWLINE\[NEWLINE \|T\|_{1,\infty}:=\sup_{n\in \mathbb{N}}\frac{1}{\log(n+1)}\sum_{k=1}^ns_k(T)<\infty, NEWLINE\]NEWLINE where \(s_k(T)\) denotes the \(k\)-th singular value of \(T\).NEWLINENEWLINE A normalised linear functional \(\omega\) on \(\ell^{\infty}\) is called a generalised limit if it is positive and maps every convergent sequence to its ordinary limit. It is known that every dilation invariant generalised limit \(\omega\) generates a non-normal trace \(\text{Tr}_{\omega}\) on \(\mathcal{M}_{1,\infty}\) by setting NEWLINE\[NEWLINE \text{Tr}_{\omega}(T):=\omega\bigg(n\mapsto \frac{1}{\log(n+1)}\sum_{k=1}^ns_k(T)\bigg) NEWLINE\]NEWLINE for positive operators \(T\in \mathcal{M}_{1,\infty}\) and extending (see \textit{A. Connes} [Noncommutative geometry. San Diego, CA: Academic Press (1994; Zbl 0818.46076)]). The traces \(\text{Tr}_{\omega}\) are called Dixmier traces in the present paper.NEWLINENEWLINE Denote by \(\mathcal{D}\) the set of all Dixmier traces and by \(\mathcal{D}_0\) the set of all Dixmier traces which are generated by dilation and translation invariant generalised limits (this is the class originally considered by \textit{J. Dixmier} [C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, Sér. A 262, 1107--1108 (1966; Zbl 0141.12902)]). Also, denote by \(\mathcal{D}_{M}\) the set of all Dixmier traces generated by \(M\)-invariant generalised limits, where a generalised limit \(\omega\) is called \(M\)-invariant if \(\omega=\omega\circ M\) and the operator \(M:\ell^{\infty} \rightarrow \ell^{\infty}\) is defined by NEWLINE\[NEWLINE (Mx)(n):=\frac{1}{\log(n+1)}\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{x(k)}{k} \;\;\;\forall n\in \mathbb{N},\, \forall x\in \ell^{\infty}. NEWLINE\]NEWLINE For \(\mathcal{B}\in \{\mathcal{D},\mathcal{D}_M\}\), an operator \(T\in \mathcal{M}_{1,\infty}\) is called \(\mathcal{B}\)-measurable if it takes the same value under every trace from \(\mathcal{B}\). These concepts are of importance in noncommutative geometry (see, for example, [Connes, loc. cit.]).NEWLINENEWLINE The authors prove various results concerning Dixmier traces and the corresponding measurable operators. They prove that the classes \(\mathcal{D}\) and \(\mathcal{D}_0\) coincide and give a new characterisation of \(\mathcal{D}\)-measurable operators in terms of the existence of a certain uniform limit. Furthermore, they show the existence of a \(\mathcal{D}_M\)-measurable operator which is not \(\mathcal{D}\)-measurable. The authors mainly work in the context of the Lorentz function space \(M_{1,\infty}\) and use versions of generalized limits on \(L^{\infty}(0,\infty)\) and \(L^{\infty}(\mathbb{R})\), but the results can be transferred to \(\mathcal{M}_{1,\infty}\).NEWLINENEWLINE In the last section of the paper, the authors also give a negative answer to a question from [\textit{M.-T. Benameur} and \textit{T. Fack}, Adv. Math. 199, No. 1, 29--87 (2006; Zbl 1092.46050), Remark 1], concerning a possible further generalisation of certain Lidskii-type formulae for Dixmier traces which had been proved in Theorem 1 of Benameur and Fack [loc. cit.].
      0 references

      Identifiers