Multiple Probability Assessments by Dependent Experts
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cited in
(22)- Modeling expert judgements for Bayesian updating
- Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior
- Comparison of experts
- On a certain approach to ``risk-in-risk estimator
- Combining expert judgment: On the performance of trimmed mean vote aggregation procedures in the presence of strategic voting
- Assessing the value of a second opinion: The role and structure of exchangeability
- Combining expert probabilities using the product of odds
- Calibrating expert assessments using hierarchical Gaussian process models
- Statistical auditing of non-transparent expert assessments
- Multicriteria estimation of probabilities on basis of expert non-numeric, non-exact and non-complete knowledge
- Assessing dependence: some experimental results
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 992643 (Why is no real title available?)
- Subjective probability assessment of a Markov process using a decision analysis expert
- Correlated Binary Variables and Multi‐level Probability Assessments
- Reliability (and Fault Tree) Analysis Using Expert Opinions
- How Many Forecasters Do You Really Have? Mahalanobis Provides the Intuition for the Surprising Clemen and Winkler Result
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 474426 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4119887 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2106830 (Why is no real title available?)
- Using Expert Opinions in Bayesian Prediction of Component Lifetimes in a Shock Model
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 927322 (Why is no real title available?)
- Understanding pooled subjective probability estimates
This page was built for publication: Multiple Probability Assessments by Dependent Experts
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3690845)
