The carneades model of argument and burden of proof
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1028962
DOI10.1016/J.ARTINT.2007.04.010zbMATH Open1168.68566OpenAlexW2109409153MaRDI QIDQ1028962FDOQ1028962
Authors: Thomas F. Gordon, Henry Prakken, Walton, Douglas 
Publication date: 9 July 2009
Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/2796516/GordonPrakkenWalton2007a.pdf
Recommendations
burden of proofargumentation schemesargument evaluationargument graphsargument structurelegal argumentproof standards
Cites Work
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- Floating conclusions and zombie paths: Two deep difficulties in the ``directly skeptical approach to defeasible inheritance nets
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation
- Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
- Conditional entailment: bridging two approaches to default reasoning.
- Dynamic argument systems: A formal model of argumentation processes based on situation calculus
- SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
- Revised report on the algorithmic language scheme
- Properties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues
- Defeasible Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach towards Defeasible Argumentation
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Argumentation machines. New frontiers in argument and computation.
- DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions
- Title not available (Why is that?)
Cited In (20)
- Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities
- Arguing about the trustworthiness of the information sources
- Argumentation in artificial intelligence
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Realizability of three-valued semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks
- Logic programming and burden of proof in legal reasoning
- Analyzing the computational complexity of abstract dialectical frameworks via approximation fixpoint theory
- Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
- Still Craving a Porsche
- Practical Normative Reasoning with Defeasible Deontic Logic
- Approximating operators and semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks
- Reasoning on the web with assumption-based argumentation
- A socio-cognitive model of trust using argumentation theory
- The first international competition on computational models of argumentation: results and analysis
- Combining Modes of Reasoning: An Application of Abstract Argumentation
- Burdens of persuasion and standards of proof in structured argumentation
- The burden of persuasion in abstract argumentation
- A normative framework for argument quality: argumentation schemes with a Bayesian foundation
- Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey
- Assessing the epistemological relevance of Dung-style argumentation theories
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: The carneades model of argument and burden of proof
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1028962)
