The carneades model of argument and burden of proof
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:1028962)
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1735835 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1945744 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1852916 (Why is no real title available?)
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
- Argumentation machines. New frontiers in argument and computation.
- Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation
- Conditional entailment: bridging two approaches to default reasoning.
- DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions
- Defeasible Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach towards Defeasible Argumentation
- Dynamic argument systems: A formal model of argumentation processes based on situation calculus
- Floating conclusions and zombie paths: Two deep difficulties in the ``directly skeptical approach to defeasible inheritance nets
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Properties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues
- Revised report on the algorithmic language scheme
- SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
Cited in
(20)- A socio-cognitive model of trust using argumentation theory
- Logic programming and burden of proof in legal reasoning
- Arguing about the trustworthiness of the information sources
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7455715 (Why is no real title available?)
- Practical Normative Reasoning with Defeasible Deontic Logic
- Still Craving a Porsche
- Realizability of three-valued semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks
- The first international competition on computational models of argumentation: results and analysis
- Analyzing the computational complexity of abstract dialectical frameworks via approximation fixpoint theory
- Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
- Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities
- A normative framework for argument quality: argumentation schemes with a Bayesian foundation
- Approximating operators and semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks
- Assessing the epistemological relevance of Dung-style argumentation theories
- Reasoning on the web with assumption-based argumentation
- Combining Modes of Reasoning: An Application of Abstract Argumentation
- Argumentation in artificial intelligence
- Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey
- Burdens of persuasion and standards of proof in structured argumentation
- The burden of persuasion in abstract argumentation
This page was built for publication: The carneades model of argument and burden of proof
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1028962)
