Fuzzy aggregation in economic environments: I. Quantitative fuzziness, public goods and monotonicity assumptions.
Considering fuzzy aggregation (aggregation of list of individual fuzzy preferences into a social fuzzy preference), Barrett, Pattanaik and Salles (BPS) showed that Arrow's impossibility theorem and Gibbard's oligarchy theorem are essentially preserved, given appropriate properties of fuzzy preferences and a sort of unrestricted domain condition. The authors consider that the set of alternatives has some specific mathematical structure, i.e., is the nonnegative orthant of a finite-dimensional Euclidean space and preferences satisfy monotonicity properties, while BPS other assumptions are preserved. They show that according to which monotonicity properties are made, possibility results or impossibility results prevail.
- Aggregation of fuzzy preferences: some rules of the mean
- Characterization of domains admitting nondictatorial social welfare functions and nonmanipulable voting procedures
- Domain conditions in social choice theory
- Fuzzy preferences and social choice
- General Possibility Theorems for Group Decisions
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3148878 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3361657 (Why is no real title available?)
- On choosing rationally when preferences are fuzzy
- On the structure of fuzzy social welfare functions
- Rationality and aggregation of preferences in an ordinally fuzzy framework
- Social choice and individual values
- Social choice and Lukasiewicz logic
- The Simple Majority Decision Rule
- Transitivity and fuzzy preferences.
- Wang's paradox
- Fuzzy Arrow-type results without the Pareto principle based on fuzzy pre-orders
- Arrow-type results under intuitionistic fuzzy preferences
- Independence of irrelevant alternatives and fuzzy Arrow's theorem
- Arrow-type results under fuzzy preferences based on filter and ultrafilter
- Aggregation of preferences: The fuzzy case
This page was built for publication: Fuzzy aggregation in economic environments: I. Quantitative fuzziness, public goods and monotonicity assumptions.
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1398326)