Why does voting get so complicated? A review of theories for analyzing democratic participation
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:1429026)
Recommendations
Cites work
- A multistage game representation of sophisticated voting for binary procedures
- Advances in the spatial theory of voting.
- Chaotic elections! A mathematician looks at voting
- Equilibrium in spatial voting: The median voter result is an artifact
- Estimating the Probability of Events That Have Never Occurred: When Is Your Vote Decisive?
- Expected Plurality Voting Equilibrium and Social Choice Functions
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2129302 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3137856 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3148878 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3854738 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3715248 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3361657 (Why is no real title available?)
- Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control
- Limiting distributions for continuous state Markov voting models
- Social choice and individual values
Cited in
(5)- Spatial optimization problem for locating polling facilities and stations and policy implications
- Constitutions, voting and democracy: a review
- Calculating the total vote where the district magnitude is greater than one: A test of some algorithms using British local election data
- The Mathematics of Voting and Elections: A Hands-On Approach
- Fair group decisions via non-deterministic proportional consensus
This page was built for publication: Why does voting get so complicated? A review of theories for analyzing democratic participation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1429026)