Belief-weighted Nash aggregation of Savage preferences
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1622449
DOI10.1016/j.jet.2018.09.008zbMath1417.91197OpenAlexW2893683697MaRDI QIDQ1622449
Publication date: 19 November 2018
Published in: Journal of Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://www.cireqmontreal.com/wp-content/uploads/cahiers/21-2018-cah.pdf
Related Items (4)
Bayesian social aggregation with accumulating evidence ⋮ Smooth aggregation of Bayesian experts ⋮ Fully Bayesian aggregation ⋮ Relative utilitarianism under uncertainty
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- The paradox of the Bayesian experts and state-dependent utility theory
- A counterexample to Dhillon (1998)
- Do bets reveal beliefs? A unified perspective on state-dependent utility issues
- Consistent Bayesian aggregation
- Extended Pareto rules and relative utilitarianism
- Preference aggregation under uncertainty: Savage vs. Pareto
- The Bargaining Problem
- Bayesian Aggregation
- The Nash Social Welfare Function
- The Impossibility of Bayesian Group Decision Making with Separate Aggregation of Beliefs and Values
- Irrelevant Alternatives and Social Welfare
- Impartiality: Definition and Representation
- Relative Utilitarianism
- No-Betting-Pareto Dominance
This page was built for publication: Belief-weighted Nash aggregation of Savage preferences