Who should cast the casting vote? Using sequential voting to amalgamate information
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1706791
DOI10.1007/S11238-017-9593-0zbMATH Open1395.91151OpenAlexW2592893924WikidataQ59613989 ScholiaQ59613989MaRDI QIDQ1706791FDOQ1706791
Authors: Bo Chen, Steve Alpern
Publication date: 28 March 2018
Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11238-017-9593-0
Recommendations
- The importance of voting order for jury decisions by sequential majority voting
- Optimizing voting order on sequential juries: a median voter theorem and beyond
- Jury theorems with multiple alternatives
- Voting with Limited Information and Many Alternatives
- Voting with limited information and many alternatives
Cites Work
- Topological sorting of large networks
- Beyond Condorcet: optimal aggregation rules using voting records
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Thirteen theorems in search of the truth
- Optimal Jury Selection: A Game-Theoretic Model for the Exercise of Peremptory Challenges
- Optimal Challenges for Selection
- The significance of independent decisions in uncertain dichotomous choice situations
- A sequential selection game with vetoes
- The importance of voting order for jury decisions by sequential majority voting
- Budget-Optimal Task Allocation for Reliable Crowdsourcing Systems
- Are referees sufficiently informed about the editor's practice?
Cited In (3)
This page was built for publication: Who should cast the casting vote? Using sequential voting to amalgamate information
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1706791)