Use of integrator in nonlinear \(H_{\infty}\) design for disturbance rejection

DOI10.1016/S0005-1098(02)00117-6zbMath1087.93510OpenAlexW1978027938MaRDI QIDQ1858867

Steven W. Su, Brian D. O. Anderson, Thomas S. Brinsmead

Publication date: 17 February 2003

Published in: Automatica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-1098(02)00117-6

zbMATH Keywords

nonlinear control\(H_{\infty}\) controlDisturbance rejection

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Sensitivity (robustness) (93B35) Perturbations in control/observation systems (93C73) (H^infty)-control (93B36)

Related Items (2)

Conditions on input disturbance suppression for multivariable nonlinear systems on the basis of feedforward passivity ⋮ Guaranteed performance in semi global trajectory tracking for matched disturbance nonlinear systems

Cites Work

• Stability by Liapunov's direct method. With applications
• Structurally stable output regulation of nonlinear systems
• L\(_2\)-gain and passivity techniques in nonlinear control
• H_∞ control via measurement feedback for affine nonlinear systems
• Extending H^∞ Control to Nonlinear Systems: Control of Nonlinear Systems to Achieve Performance Objectives
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Use of integrator in nonlinear \(H_{\infty}\) design for disturbance rejection