A derivation of the money rawlsian solution

DOI10.1007/BF00179981zbMATH Open0839.90015OpenAlexW2016018720MaRDI QIDQ1897504FDOQ1897504

Authors: Enriqueta Aragonès 

Publication date: 23 June 1996

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00179981

Recommendations

• An algorithm for envy-free allocations in an economy with indivisible objects and money
• Envy-free and Pareto efficient allocations in economies with indivisible goods and money
• Refinements of the no-envy solution in economies with indivisible goods
• Are incentives against economic justice?
• Money-egalitarian-equivalent and gain-maximin allocations of indivisible items with monetary compensation

zbMATH Keywords

indivisible objectsquasi-linear utility functionsenvy-free allocations

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14) General equilibrium theory (91B50)

Cited In (19)

• Two birds with one stone: fairness and welfare via transfers
• Envy-free and Pareto efficient allocations in economies with indivisible goods and money
• An algorithm for envy-free allocations in an economy with indivisible objects and money
• Are incentives against economic justice?
• Money matters: an axiomatic theory of the endowment effect
• An algorithm for identifying least manipulable envy‐free and budget‐balanced allocations in economies with indivisibilities
• Solving house allocation problems with risk-averse agents
• Constrainedly fair job assignments under minimum wages
• One quarter each (on average) ensures proportionality
• Auctioning or assigning an object: some remarkable VCG mechanisms
• Computing envy-freeable allocations with limited subsidies
• Eliciting preferences to assign positions and compensation
• Fully polynomial-time approximation schemes for fair rent division
• A polynomial algorithm for maxmin and minmax envy-free rent division on a soft budget
• Least manipulable envy-free rules in economies with indivisibilities
• Ricardian equivalence. Are the required assumptions defensible?
• A fair and truthful mechanism with limited subsidy
• Balancedness of permutation games and envy-free allocations in indivisible good economies
• Divide and compromise

This page was built for publication: A derivation of the money rawlsian solution

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1897504)