The intellectual influence of economic journals: quality versus quantity
The paper under review introduces modified methods for quality indicators for academic journals that avoid manipulations on article-splitting, and uses them to provide scores and rankings for economic journals. Properly evaluating research activities from publishing in academic journals both cardinal and ordinal is not easy, even in narrow fields. \textit{E. Garfield} [``Citation indexes to science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas, Science 122 (3159), 108--111 (1955), \url{http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/science1955.pdf}] introduces the predominant scoring method for measuring intellectual influence as the impact factor, \textit{S. J. Liebowitz} and \textit{J. C. Palmer} [``Assessing the relative impacts of economics journals, J. Econ. Lit. 22, No. 1, 77--88 (1984)] and \textit{D. N. Laband} and \textit{M. J. Piette} [``The relative impacts of economics journals: 1970--1990, J. Econ. Lit. 32, 640--666 (1994)] use the so-called LP method, and \textit{G. Pinski} and \textit{F. Narin} [``Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: theory, with application to the literature of physics, Inf. Process. Manag. 12, No. 5, 297--312 (1976)] introduce the invariant method. The core method of how search engines rank web pages is the PageRank algorithm developed by \textit{S. Brin} and \textit{L. Page} [``The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine, Comput. Netw. ISDN Syst. 30, No. 1--2, 107--117 (1998; \url{doi:10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00110-X}]. Let \(J=\{1, \dots, n\}\) be a finite set of academic journals. Define \(c_{ij}\) to be the number of citations to journal \(i\) by journal \(j\), \(c_j=\sum_{i\in J}c_{ij}\) be the total number of citations made by journal \(j\) and \(a_j\) be the total number of articles in journal \(j\). Then one can define the citation matrix \(C= (c_{ij})_{i, j\in J}\), the diagonal matrix \(D_C = \text{diag} (c_j)_{j\in J}\) be the diagonal matrix with elements in \(\{c_j\}_{j\in J}\). Similarly, the diagonal matrix \(A= \text{diag} (a_j)_{j\in J}\) be the diagonal matrix with elements in \(\{a_j\}_{j\in J}\). {\parindent=8mm \begin{itemize}\item[(i)] The impact factor gives valuations according to the valuation vector \(v\) that solves \(v = A^{-1}C e\), where \(A, C\) contain data for a two-year period and \(e\) is a vector of ones; \item[(ii)] The LP method gives \(v\) that solves \(v= \frac{A^{-1}C v}{\|A^{-1}C v\|}\); \item[(iii)] The invariant method gives \(v\) that solves \(v = A^{-1} C D_C^{-1}Av\). \end{itemize}} The modified impact factor, the modified LP method and the modified invariant method simply replace \(A\) by \(D_C\) in the above definitions. The authors give the scoring methods and definitions in Section 2 and prove that the impact factor, the LP method and the invariant method are biased against article-splitting in Theorem 1 of Section 3. The implications of the main result Theorem 1 show that quality and quantity are indistinguishable at article level and that those scoring methods are manipulable. Examples on scoring methods yielding the typical influence per page are also given in Section 3. Section 4 presents the authors' modified scoring methods that interpret a journal as an intermediary that adds value when converting inputs into outputs. These modifications allow restoring the desirable invariance into article-splitting. However, a precise result to the modified methods is not stated. In Section 5 the authors provide scores and rankings for economic journals that reflect the current trends in the influence of economic journals by adapting their modified methods.
- An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
- Economists' models of learning
- Gains from manipulating social choice rules
- Google's PageRank and beyond. The science of search engine rankings
- Losses due to manipulation of social choice rules
- Multiagent Systems
- On two theorems of Frobenius
- Reaching a Consensus
- The Measurement of Intellectual Influence
- An empirical method for assessing the research relevance gap
- Evaluating journal quality: a review of journal citation indicators and ranking in business and management
- Search and research: the influence of editorial boards on journals' quality
- On the influence of a ranking system
- Research on evaluation of core competitiveness of network academic journals
- Mathematical properties of weighted impact factors based on measures of prestige of the citing journals
- Corrigendum: ``Worldwide institutional and individual rankings in econometrics over the period 1989--1999: an update
- Ranking journals in sociology, education, and public administration by social choice theory methods
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1841927 (Why is no real title available?)
- Credibility adjustment estimation of journal impact factors in Bayesian model
- PROLIFERATION OF ACADEMIC JOURNALS: EFFECTS ON RESEARCH QUANTITY AND QUALITY
- Robust ranking of journal quality: an application to economics
- Ranking journal quality by harmonic mean of ranks: an application to ISI Statistics \& Probability
- Bibliometric indices as a measure of performance and competitive balance in the knockout stage of the UEFA champions league
This page was built for publication: The intellectual influence of economic journals: quality versus quantity
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1950342)