On the significance of the prior of a correct decision in committees

DOI10.1007/S11238-013-9362-7MaRDI QIDQ2015039zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Ruth Ben-Yashar, Shmuel Nitzan

Publication date 18 June 2014

Published in Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-013-9362-7

zbMATH Keywords

majority rulecommitteeoptimal decision ruleprior-based rule

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14)

Recommendations

• The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework
• Expert rule versus majority rule under partial information. II.
• Conditions for the optimality of simple majority decisions in pairwise choice situations
• Optimal decision rules for fixed-size committees in polychotomous choice situations
• Monotonicity in Condorcet jury theorem

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1897331 (Why is no real title available?)
• Beyond Condorcet: optimal aggregation rules using voting records
• First and second best voting rules in committees
• Monotonicity in Condorcet jury theorem
• Optimal Decision Rules in Uncertain Dichotomous Choice Situations
• Optimal collective dichotomous choice under quota constraints
• Symmetric and asymmetric committees
• The Optimal Decision Rule for Fixed-Size Committees in Dichotomous Choice Situations: The General Result
• When is Condorcet's jury theorem valid?

Cited in

(3)

• The role of prior in optimal team decisions for pattern recognition
• Voting with public information
• The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework

This page was built for publication: On the significance of the prior of a correct decision in committees

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2015039)