New variable-population paradoxes for resource allocation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2247950
DOI10.1007/s00355-013-0731-5zbMath1291.91146OpenAlexW2077321147WikidataQ59972703 ScholiaQ59972703MaRDI QIDQ2247950
Publication date: 30 June 2014
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://rcer.econ.rochester.edu/RCERPAPERS/rcer_575.pdf
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- Progressive and merging-proof taxation
- Problems of fair division and the egalitarian solution
- Core is manipulable via segmentation
- Non-manipulable division rules in claim problems and generalizations
- Proportional scheduling, split-proofness, and merge-proofness
- A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
- Can pre-arranged matches be avoided in two-sided matching markets?
- Manipulation via merging and splitting in claims problems
- Population monotonic rules for fair allocation problems
- A note on Gale's example
- The Fair Division of a Fixed Supply Among a Growing Population
- Paradoxes of Preferential Voting
- Manipulation via Endowments
- On Scheduling Fees to Prevent Merging, Splitting, and Transferring of Jobs
- Fair Net Trades
This page was built for publication: New variable-population paradoxes for resource allocation