Individual or team decision-making--causes and consequences of self-selection
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:2507675)
Recommendations
- Are four heads better than two? An experimental beauty-contest game with teams of different size
- Group polarization in the team dictator game reconsidered
- Exploring group decision making in a power-to-take experiment
- Does consultation improve decision-making?
- Individual vs. group decision-making: an experiment on dynamic choice under risk and ambiguity
Cites work
- `Learning' with no feedback in a competitive guessing game.
- A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games
- Are four heads better than two? An experimental beauty-contest game with teams of different size
- Are groups more (or less) consistent than individuals?
- Barking up the right tree: Are small groups rational agents?
- Experimental `beauty contests' with homogeneous and heterogeneous players and with interior and boundary equilibria
- Individual and group behavior in the ultimatum game: Are groups more ``rational players?
- The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money
Cited in
(10)- Are four heads better than two? An experimental beauty-contest game with teams of different size
- Decision-making with reference information
- Endogenous group formation and responsibility diffusion: an experimental study
- Are individuals more risk and ambiguity averse in a group environment or alone? Results from an experimental study
- Heterogeneity, inequity aversion, and group performance
- Asymmetric guessing games
- An experimental study of prisoners' dilemma and stag hunt games played by teams of players
- Group polarization in the team dictator game reconsidered
- Positioning of new brands in an experiment
- Can groups solve the problem of over-bidding in contests?
This page was built for publication: Individual or team decision-making--causes and consequences of self-selection
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2507675)