Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:465598)
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 41812 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 700081 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3366923 (Why is no real title available?)
- A behavioral foundation for fuzzy measures
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
- Arguing with valued preference relations
- Defeasible Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach towards Defeasible Argumentation
- Extending Argumentation to Make Good Decisions
- Fuzzy implications
- How to reason defeasibly
- Implication in fuzzy logic
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- On the intuition of rank-dependent utility
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
- Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks
- Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
Cited in
(7)- Representing synergy among arguments with Choquet integral
- Constrained Value-Based Argumentation Framework
- Defining argument weighing functions
- A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic
- Arguing with valued preference relations
- Weighted argumentation
This page was built for publication: Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q465598)