Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats

DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2013.12.001MaRDI QIDQ465598zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Souhila Kaci, Christophe Labreuche

Publication date 23 October 2014

Published in International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2013.12.001

zbMATH Keywords

argumentationvalued preference relationvaried-strength defeat relation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Recommendations

• Arguing with valued preference relations
• A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Weighted argumentation
• Representing synergy among arguments with Choquet integral
• Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 41812 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 700081 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3366923 (Why is no real title available?)
• A behavioral foundation for fuzzy measures
• A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
• A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
• Arguing with valued preference relations
• Defeasible Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach towards Defeasible Argumentation
• Extending Argumentation to Make Good Decisions
• Fuzzy implications
• How to reason defeasibly
• Implication in fuzzy logic
• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
• On the intuition of rank-dependent utility
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
• Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks
• Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results

Cited in

(7)

• Representing synergy among arguments with Choquet integral
• Constrained Value-Based Argumentation Framework
• Defining argument weighing functions
• A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic
• Arguing with valued preference relations
• Weighted argumentation

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• OSCAR
• M-MACBETH

This page was built for publication: Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q465598)