Abelian varieties over Q and modular forms

From MaRDI portal
Publication:4672847



Abstract: This paper gives a conjectural characterization of those elliptic curves over the field of complex numbers which "should" be covered by standard modular curves. The elliptic curves in question all have algebraic j-invariant, so they can be viewed as curves over Q-bar, the field of algebraic numbers. The condition that they satisfy is that they must be isogenous to all their Galois conjugates. Borrowing a term from B.H. Gross, "Arithmetic on elliptic curves with complex multiplication," we say that the elliptic curves in question are "Q-curves." Since all complex multiplication elliptic curves are Q-curves (with this definition), and since they are all uniformized by modular forms (Shimura), we consider only non-CM curves for the remainder of this abstract. We prove: 1. Let C be an elliptic curve over Q-bar. Then C is a Q-curve if and only if C is a Q-bar simple factor of an abelian variety A over Q whose algebra of Q-endomorphisms is a number field of degree dim(A). (We say that abelian varieties A/Q with this property are of "GL(2) type.") 2. Suppose that Serre's conjecture on mod p modular forms are correct (Ref: Duke Journal, 1987). Then an abelian variety A over Q is of GL(2)-type if and only if it is a simple factor (over Q) of the Jacobian J_1(N) for some integer Nge1. (The abelian variety J_1(N) is the Jacobian of the standard modular


This is in fact an old and quite famous paper. It appeared in [Algebra and topology 1992 (Taejŏn), Korea Adv. Inst. Sci. Tech., Taejŏn, 53--79 (1992)], and is reprinted here by permission of the Korean editors. It is simply reprinted: the author has changed nothing, and in this subject rather a lot has changed in the meantime. The Taniyama conjecture, the paper begins, says that any elliptic curve \(C\) over \({\mathbb Q}\) of conductor \(N\) has a non-constant map \(X_0(N)\to C\) defined over \({\mathbb Q}\). Of course this is now a theorem. Now, if there is a non-constant map \(X_1(M)\to C\) defined over \({\mathbb Q}\), for some \(M>0\) (not necessarily \(M=N\)) then ``one knows that the Taniyama conjecture holds for that curve. Mazur proved that if there is a map \(X_1(M)\to C\) defined over the complex numbers then there is a map \(X_1(M')\to C\) defined over \({\mathbb Q}\), for some \(M'\) (in general equal neither to \(M\) nor to \(N\)). So the existence of such a map implies Taniyama, and conversely Taniyama gives a map \(X_0(N)\to C\) so by picking out a generator of the cyclic subgroup of order \(N\) one gets a map \(X_1(N)\to C\). Serre asked for a characterisation of elliptic curves over the complex numbers (in fact, necessarily over \(\overline {\mathbb Q}\)) which admit a map from \(X_1(M)\), i.e. which are quotients of \(J_1(M)=\text{Jac\,} X_1(M)\), for some \(M>0\). All CM curves do (a result of Shimura): discarding them, Ribet defines an abelian variety over \({\mathbb Q}\) to be of \(\text{GL}_2\)-type if \({\text{End}}_{\mathbb Q}(A)\otimes{\mathbb Q}\) contains (is, if A is simple over \({\mathbb Q}\)) a number field \(E\) of degree equal to \(\dim A\). Ribet proves here: if \(C\) is a non-CM elliptic curve over \(\overline {\mathbb Q}\), then it is a quotient of an abelian variety of \(\text{GL}_2\)-type iff it is isogenous to each of its Galois conjugates (such a curve is called a \({\mathbb Q}\)-curve). He also proves that every abelian variety of \(\text{GL}_2\)-type is a quotient of \(J_1(M)\) for some \(M>0\), assuming a conjecture of \textit{J.-P. Serre} [Duke Math. J. 54, 179--230 (1987; Zbl 0641.10026)] on representations of \({\text{Gal}}(\overline {\mathbb Q}/{\mathbb Q})\). This says very roughly that absolutely irreducible representations of dimension~\(2\) should be modular, arising from newforms of prescribed level, weight and character. Ribet applies this to the representations coming from the action of the Galois group on the Tate module \(V_\ell\), for \(\ell\) a prime of good reduction: these are attached to primes \(\lambda\) of \(E\) dividing \(\ell\). Then there is an abelian variety associated with the modular form, and by a theorem of Faltings it is automatically a quotient of \(J_1(M)\), where \(M\) is the level. Since this paper first appeared, \textit{J. S. Ellenberg} and \textit{C. Skinner} [Duke Math. J. 109, No. 1, 97--122 (2001; Zbl 1009.11038)] have shown that every \({\mathbb Q}\)-curve satisfying a technical condition at the prime~\(3\) is modular, i.e. is a quotient of some \(J_1(M)\). They do not prove Serre's conjecture, however; but there is some recent progress in that direction too in a preprint of C.~Khare. Reviewer's remark: I was assisted in writing this review by Kevin Buzzard, who drew my attention to the paper of Ellenberg and Skinner and to Khare's preprint. For the entire collection see [Zbl 1032.11002].




Cited in
(58)








This page was built for publication: Abelian varieties over \(\mathbb{Q}\) and modular forms

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4672847)