Three ways to compute accurately the probability of the referendum paradox

DOI10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2011.04.006zbMath1229.91113OpenAlexW2082420718MaRDI QIDQ554497

Dominique Lepelley, Vincent R. Merlin, Jean Louis Rouet

Publication date: 4 August 2011

Published in: Mathematical Social Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2011.04.006

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Voting theory (91B12) History, political science (91F10)

Related Items (6)

Majority Efficient Representation of the Citizens in a Federal Union ⋮ The probability of majority inversion in a two-stage voting system with three states ⋮ Asymptotic probability of majority inversion under a general binomial voting model ⋮ The theoretical Shapley-Shubik probability of an election inversion in a toy symmetric version of the US presidential electoral system ⋮ The number of parties and decision-making in legislatures ⋮ A note on the direct democracy deficit in two-tier voting

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• The probability of conflicts in a U. S. presidential type election
• On Ehrhart polynomials and probability calculations in voting theory
• Probability calculations under the IAC hypothesis

This page was built for publication: Three ways to compute accurately the probability of the referendum paradox