Condorcet’s Paradox

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5483165

DOI10.1007/3-540-33799-7zbMath1122.91027OpenAlexW4243394487WikidataQ56644736 ScholiaQ56644736MaRDI QIDQ5483165

William V. Gehrlein

Publication date: 16 August 2006

Published in: Theory and Decision Library C: (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33799-7




Related Items (37)

The likelihood of single-peaked preferences under classic and new probability distribution assumptionsAn analysis of random elections with large numbers of votersShould voters be required to rank candidates in an election?Probabilistic view of voting, paradoxes, and manipulationBook review of: G. G. Szpiro, Numbers rule. The vexing mathematics of democracy, from Plato to the presentAsymptotic vulnerability of positional voting rules to coalitional manipulationAn interactive approach to determine the elements of a pairwise comparison matrixAre Condorcet procedures so bad according to the reinforcement axiom?Similarity Suppresses Cyclicity: Why Similar Competitors Form HierarchiesBeyond the worst case: semi-random complexity analysis of winner determinationThe likelihood of a Condorcet winner in the logrolling settingWhen ties are possible: weak Condorcet winners and Arrovian rationalityOn the likelihood of single-peaked preferencesDeveloping the aggregate empirical side of computational social choiceMonotonicity paradoxes in three-candidate elections using scoring elimination rulesIntransitivity and meta-intransitivity: meta-dice, levers and other opportunitiesVoting with rubber bands, weights, and stringsThe reinforcement axiom under sequential positional rulesThe impact of voters' preference diversity on the probability of some electoral outcomesBorda's paradox with weighted scoring rulesSimple manipulation-resistant voting systems designed to elect Condorcet candidates and suitable for large-scale public electionsWhat shall we do with the cyclic profile?Generalized Condorcet winnersProbability calculations under the IAC hypothesisFrequency based analysis of collective aggregation rulesA Geometric Approach to Paradoxes of Majority Voting: From Anscombe’s Paradox to the Discursive Dilemma with Saari and NurmiHow frequently do different voting rules encounter voting paradoxes in three-candidate elections?Triple-acyclicity in majorities based on difference in supportOn the probability of observing Borda's paradoxExtremal Restriction, Condorcet Sets, and Majority Decision MakingVoces populi and the art of listeningOn the stability of a triplet of scoring rulesThe Borda rule and the pairwise-majority-loser revisitedA comparison of theoretical and empirical evaluations of the Borda compromiseProbabilities of electoral outcomes: from three-candidate to four-candidate electionsThe unexpected behavior of plurality ruleStructured preferences: a literature survey




This page was built for publication: Condorcet’s Paradox