Do small players undermine cooperation in asymmetric games?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6548528
DOI10.1007/S13235-023-00532-9zbMATH Open1539.91011MaRDI QIDQ6548528FDOQ6548528
Authors: C. F. Mason
Publication date: 1 June 2024
Published in: Dynamic Games and Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)
Recommendations
Cites Work
- International pollution control: Cooperative versus noncooperative strategies
- The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information
- Can international environmental cooperation be bought?
- A climate agreement with full participation
- Regional versus global cooperation for climate control
- Dynamic effects on the stability of international environmental agreements
- Extremal equlibria of oligopolistic supergames
- The Determination of Price and Output Quotas in a Heterogeneous Cartel
- Optimal institutional arrangements for transboundary pollutants in a second-best world: evidence from a differential game with asymmetric players
- An infinite-horizon model of dynamic membership of international environmental agreements
- Pollution control: A differential game approach
- The Limits of Monopolization Through Acquisition
- Theory of Shell Structures
- Demons and repentance
- Cooperation in dynamic games with asymmetric players: the role of social preferences
- Collaborative environmental management: a review of the literature
- Title not available (Why is that?)
Cited In (1)
This page was built for publication: Do small players undermine cooperation in asymmetric games?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6548528)