Ensuring every candidate wins under positional voting

DOI10.1007/S00355-008-0359-ZzbMATH Open1190.91046OpenAlexW2112636404MaRDI QIDQ839624FDOQ839624

Authors: Christopher R. H. Hanusa 

Publication date: 2 September 2009

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0359-z

Recommendations

• On the relationship of the Condorcet winner and positional voting rules
• Connecting pairwise and positional election outcomes
• Exact results on manipulability of positional voting rules
• Which scoring rule maximizes condorcet efficiency under IAC?
• Positional rules and \(q\)-Condorcet consistency

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Group preferences (91B10) Voting theory (91B12)

Cites Work

• Basic Geometry of Voting
• Mathematical structure of voting paradoxes. II: Positional voting
• How many voters are needed for paradoxes?
• Inverted orders for monotone scoring rules
• Millions of election outcomes from a single profile

This page was built for publication: Ensuring every candidate wins under positional voting

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q839624)