Revenue equivalence revisited

DOI10.1016/J.GEB.2008.01.003MaRDI QIDQ952771zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Radosveta Ivanova-Stenzel, Timothy C. Salmon

Publication date 14 November 2008

Published in Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/13376/

zbMATH Keywords

ascending auctionsendogenous entryprivate valuesbidder preferencessealed bid auctions

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models (91B26)

Recommendations

• Sealed bid auctions versus ascending bid auctions: an experimental study
• Auctions with selective entry
• A comparison of first price multi-object auctions
• Equivalence and revenue comparison among identical-item auctions
• Revenue ranking of first-price auctions with resale

Cites work

• Comparing Auctions for Risk Averse Buyers: A Buyer's Point of View
• Entry coordination in auctions and social welfare: An experimental investigation
• Optimal Auction Design
• Optimal auctions revisited
• Ranking auctions with risk adverse bidders
• Regret in auctions: theory and evidence

Cited in

(7)

• Equivalent LLTMS: a rejoinder
• Do preferences for charitable giving help auctioneers?
• Auction fever: rising revenue in second-price auction formats
• Competing first-price and second-price auctions
• Informed entry in auctions
• On the equivalence between descending bid auctions and first price sealed bid auctions
• Innovation contests with entry auction

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• Z-Tree

This page was built for publication: Revenue equivalence revisited

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q952771)