Testable implications of subjective expected utility theory
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1189219 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1189220 (Why is no real title available?)
- Are probabilities used in markets?
- Convergence in economic models with Bayesian hierarchies of beliefs
- Pure Strategy Dominance
- Rationalizability and the savage axioms
- Rationalizable Strategic Behavior and the Problem of Perfection
- Revealed preference, stochastic dominance, and the expected utility hypothesis
- Self-Calibrating Priors Do Not Exist
- The scope of the hypothesis of Bayesian equilibrium
Cited in
(14)- A theory of subjective learning
- Expected utility without parsimony
- On the falsifiability and learnability of decision theories
- Subjective expected utility theory with costly actions
- TESTING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DEPARTURES FROM UTILITY MAXIMIZATION
- What were you thinking? Decision theory as coherence test
- Testable implications of Pareto efficiency and individualrationality
- Great expectations. I: On the customizability of generalized expected utility
- On the rejectability of the subjective expected utility theory
- Utility from anticipation and personal equilibrium
- Dutch Books Arguments and Learning in a Nonexpected Utility Framework
- Abraham Wald's complete class theorem and Knightian uncertainty
- Information theory and observational limitations in decision making
- Believing in forecasts, uncertainty, and rational expectations
This page was built for publication: Testable implications of subjective expected utility theory
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q815217)