The importance of voting order for jury decisions by sequential majority voting
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1751748
DOI10.1016/j.ejor.2016.09.053zbMath1394.91113OpenAlexW2271727958MaRDI QIDQ1751748
Publication date: 25 May 2018
Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.09.053
Related Items (4)
Optimizing voting order on sequential juries: a median voter theorem and beyond ⋮ Who should cast the casting vote? Using sequential voting to amalgamate information ⋮ An iterative approach for achieving consensus when ranking a finite set of alternatives by a group of experts ⋮ A functional equation of tail-balance for continuous signals in the Condorcet jury theorem
Cites Work
- Beyond Condorcet: optimal aggregation rules using voting records
- A sequential selection game with vetoes
- A brief note on a further refinement of the Condorcet jury theorem for heterogeneous groups
- Thirteen theorems in search of the truth
- Handbook of social choice and welfare. Vol. 1.
- Comparative Reliability of Verdicts
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
This page was built for publication: The importance of voting order for jury decisions by sequential majority voting