A Cautionary Note on Exact Unconditional Inference for a Difference between Two Independent Binomial Proportions
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3079133
DOI10.1111/1541-0420.00051zbMath1210.62012OpenAlexW2094509004WikidataQ50493198 ScholiaQ50493198MaRDI QIDQ3079133
Devan V. Mehrotra, I. S. F. Chan, Roger L. Berger
Publication date: 1 March 2011
Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-0420.00051
score testFisher's exact testdiscretenessconditional testBoschloo's test\(2 \times 2\) contingency tableBerger and Boos confidence interval search
Related Items (18)
A more powerful unconditional exact test of homogeneity for 2 × c contingency table analysis ⋮ The exact unconditionalz-pooled test for equality of two binomial probabilities: optimal choice of the Berger and Boos confidence coefficient ⋮ Nearly exact sample size calculation for powerful non‐randomized tests for differences between binomial proportions ⋮ Unconditional tests for association in 2 × 2 contingency tables in the total sum fixed design ⋮ Exact change point detection with improved power in small‐sample binomial sequences ⋮ Comparison of tests for association of 2 × 2 tables under multiple testing setting ⋮ Contemporary frequentist views of the \(2\times 2\) binomial trial ⋮ A New Exact and More Powerful Unconditional Test of No Treatment Effect from Binary Matched Pairs ⋮ Robust methods to detect disease-genotype association in genetic association studies: calculate \(p\)-values using exact conditional enumeration instead of simulated permutations or asymptotic approximations ⋮ Statistical properties of exact confidence intervals from discrete data using Studentized test statistics ⋮ Practical valid inferences for the two-sample binomial problem ⋮ Computation of exact confidence limits from discrete data ⋮ Exact tests based on the Baumgartner-Weiß-Schindler statistic -- a survey ⋮ Bootstrap and Second-Order Tests of Risk Difference ⋮ Improvedp-Value Tests for Comparing Two Independent Binomial Proportions ⋮ An exhaustive numerical assessment of alternative unconditional tests of a binary treatment effect ⋮ A filter for ``confidence interval \(P\)-values ⋮ Revisiting Beal's Confidence Intervals for the Difference of Two Binomial Proportions
Cites Work
- Exact Unconditional Sample Sizes for the 2 × 2 Binomial Trial
- In dispraise of the exact test: Do the marginal totals of the \(2\times 2\) table contain relevent information respecting the table proportions?
- Choosing the optimal unconditioned test for comparing two independent proportions
- A survey of exact inference for contingency tables. With comments and a rejoinder by the author
- Confidence curves and improved exact confidence intervals for discrete distributions
- On Small-Sample Confidence Intervals for Parameters in Discrete Distributions
- A New Probability Model for Determining Exact P-Values for 2 x 2 Contingency Tables When Comparing Binomial Proportions
- Test of Significance for 2 × 2 Contingency Tables
- Small-Sample Confidence Intervals for p 1 - p 2 and p 1 /p 2 in 2 × 2 Contingency Tables
- A Nonrandomized Unconditional Test for Comparing Two Proportions in 2×2 Contigency Tables
- On the Elimination of Nuisance Parameters
- P Values Maximized Over a Confidence Set for the Nuisance Parameter
- Test‐Based Exact Confidence Intervals for the Difference of Two Binomial Proportions
- The Logic of Inductive Inference
- Raised conditional level of significance for the 2 × 2‐table when testing the equality of two probabilities
- THE MEANING OF A SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL
- A New Test for 2 × 2 Tables
This page was built for publication: A Cautionary Note on Exact Unconditional Inference for a Difference between Two Independent Binomial Proportions
