ENMPC Versus PID Control Strategies Applied to a Quadcopter

DOI10.1007/978-981-15-1819-5_16MaRDI QIDQ5857246zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Nadia Miladi, Taoufik Ladhari, Salim Hadj-Said

Publication date 31 March 2021

Published in New Trends in Robot Control (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1819-5_16

zbMATH Keywords

cascade PIDexplicit NMPCquadcopter systemtrajectory tracking

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Model predictive control (93B45) Feedback control (93B52) Automated systems (robots, etc.) in control theory (93C85)

Recommendations

• Comparison of quadrotor performance using forwarding and PID-backstepping control
• LQR-PID control applied to hexacopter flight
• Quadcopter Control Approaches and Performance Analysis
• Quadrotor stabilization under time and space constraints using implicit PID controller
• A Control Engineering Framework for Quadrotors: An Application for the Crazyflie 2.X
• Quadcopter formation flight control combining MPC and robust feedback linearization
• Compound tracking control based on MPC for quadrotors with disturbances
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7448688

Cites work

• An integral predictive/nonlinear \(\mathcal H_{\infty}\) control structure for a quadrotor helicopter

Cited in

(4)

• Optimal control strategies for load carrying drones
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7448688 (Why is no real title available?)
• Comparison of quadrotor performance using forwarding and PID-backstepping control
• Data‐enabled predictive control for quadcopters

This page was built for publication: ENMPC Versus PID Control Strategies Applied to a Quadcopter

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5857246)