Second-best mechanisms in queuing problems without transfers: the role of random priorities
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1680100
DOI10.1016/J.MATHSOCSCI.2017.08.006zbMATH Open1403.90231OpenAlexW2761005027MaRDI QIDQ1680100FDOQ1680100
Authors: Francis Bloch
Publication date: 22 November 2017
Published in: Mathematical Social Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2017.08.006
Recommendations
Cites Work
- A characterization of the Shapley value in queueing problems
- Achieving the first best in sequencing problems.
- No-envy in queueing problems
- Scheduling with Opting Out: Improving upon Random Priority
- Mechanism design in queueing problems
- Characterizations of Pareto-efficient, fair, and strategy-proof allocation rules in queueing problems
- On Scheduling Fees to Prevent Merging, Splitting, and Transferring of Jobs
- Simple sequencing problems with interdependent costs
- Proportional scheduling, split-proofness, and merge-proofness
- Egalitarian equivalence and strategyproofness in the queueing problem
Cited In (1)
This page was built for publication: Second-best mechanisms in queuing problems without transfers: the role of random priorities
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1680100)