Revenue comparison of discrete private-value auctions via weak dominance
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2318124
Recommendations
- Revenue comparison in asymmetric auctions with discrete valuations
- Asymptotic Efficiency for Discriminatory Private Value Auctions
- Revenue monotonicity in deterministic, dominant-strategy combinatorial auctions
- Revenue ranking of discriminatory and uniform auctions with an unknown number of bidders
- Asymptotic revenue equivalence in auctions
- \(k\)-price auctions: revenue inequalities, utility equivalence, and competition in auction design
- Equivalence and revenue comparison among identical-item auctions
- Revenue equivalence in asymmetric auctions
- Revenue-maximizing Dutch auctions with discrete bid levels
Cites work
- A Bidding Model of Perfect Competition
- A Comment on “Can Relaxation of Beliefs Rationalize the Winner's Curse?: An Experimental Study”
- A mechanism design approach to ranking asymmetric auctions
- Admissibility in Games
- Asymmetric Auctions
- Level-k Auctions: Can a Nonequilibrium Model of Strategic Thinking Explain the Winner's Curse and Overbidding in Private-Value Auctions?
- Monotonicity and Rationalizability in a Large First Price Auction
- On rationalizability and beliefs in discrete private-value first-price auctions
- Optimal Auction Design
- Order independence for iterated weak dominance
- Rational behavior with payoff uncertainty
- Rationalizable bidding in first-price auctions.
- Rationalizable outcomes of large private-value first-price discrete auctions.
- Uniqueness of equilibrium in sealed high-bid auctions.
- Uniqueness of the equilibrium in first-price auctions
- Weak dominance and approximate common knowledge
Cited in
(2)
This page was built for publication: Revenue comparison of discrete private-value auctions via weak dominance
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2318124)